An Equation With a Squared Term Can Have Two Answers and You Must Reject One
Test whether an equation is really quadratic, rewrite it in standard form and read off a, b and c, solve it by splitting the middle term, and learn how to reject the root that a real-world problem cannot accept.
Why can a quadratic equation have two answers when a linear one has only one?
Because squaring destroys information about sign. **Both and square to **, so an equation built on a square can be satisfied from two directions at once.
That single difference changes how you work. A linear equation such as has exactly one answer, and once you find it you are finished. A quadratic equation gives you two candidates, and finishing means deciding what to do with both of them. Sometimes both are valid. Sometimes one of them is a length of metres or an age of years, and you must say so in writing and discard it.
The chapter is built in three stages, and this part covers the first two.
- Recognise whether an equation is genuinely quadratic, and write it in the standard form with
- Solve it by factorisation, splitting the middle term exactly as you did with polynomials
- Model a real situation with a quadratic, solve it, and reject any root the situation cannot accept
The recognition step matters more than it looks. An equation can carry an on both sides and turn out to be linear once you simplify, and an equation with brackets can hide a quadratic completely. Until the equation is in standard form you do not know what you are looking at, and reading off , and from an unsimplified equation is the commonest early error in this chapter.
This page covers the first part of the CBSE Class 10 Maths chapter on quadratic equations: the standard form, solving by factorisation, and word problems where a root must be rejected.
That single difference changes how you work. A linear equation such as has exactly one answer, and once you find it you are finished. A quadratic equation gives you two candidates, and finishing means deciding what to do with both of them. Sometimes both are valid. Sometimes one of them is a length of metres or an age of years, and you must say so in writing and discard it.
The chapter is built in three stages, and this part covers the first two.
- Recognise whether an equation is genuinely quadratic, and write it in the standard form with
- Solve it by factorisation, splitting the middle term exactly as you did with polynomials
- Model a real situation with a quadratic, solve it, and reject any root the situation cannot accept
The recognition step matters more than it looks. An equation can carry an on both sides and turn out to be linear once you simplify, and an equation with brackets can hide a quadratic completely. Until the equation is in standard form you do not know what you are looking at, and reading off , and from an unsimplified equation is the commonest early error in this chapter.
This page covers the first part of the CBSE Class 10 Maths chapter on quadratic equations: the standard form, solving by factorisation, and word problems where a root must be rejected.
How do you check whether an equation is quadratic and put it in standard form?
**Expand every bracket, bring all the terms to one side, simplify, and then look at the highest power. It is quadratic only if an term survives with a non-zero coefficient.**
The standard form is
where is the **coefficient of **, the **coefficient of ** and the constant term. **The condition is part of the definition**, not a footnote — with the equation is linear and has only one root.
Worked example 1. Is a quadratic equation?
Expand the left side:
Bring everything to the left:
Yes, it is quadratic, with , and .
Worked example 2 — the equation that looks quadratic and is not. Is quadratic?
The terms are identical on both sides, so they cancel:
No — it is linear, with the single root . Check: , and . Both sides agree, so the linear answer is correct and there is no second root to look for.
That example is worth remembering. Two terms with the same coefficient on opposite sides always cancel, and an equation is judged after simplifying, never before.
Worked example 3. Is quadratic?
Yes, with , , .
Worked example 4 — a fractional equation. Write in standard form, for and .
Multiplying through by :
So it is quadratic in disguise, with , , .
Notice the restriction written alongside it. The original equation is meaningless at and , so those values would have to be discarded even if they appeared as roots. They do not here — the roots of are and — but stating the restriction is part of a complete answer.
Signs are where marks disappear. In the values are and ; writing because the number printed is is the error that then ruins every later calculation. Read the sign that sits in front of the term.
The standard form is
where is the **coefficient of **, the **coefficient of ** and the constant term. **The condition is part of the definition**, not a footnote — with the equation is linear and has only one root.
Worked example 1. Is a quadratic equation?
Expand the left side:
Bring everything to the left:
Yes, it is quadratic, with , and .
Worked example 2 — the equation that looks quadratic and is not. Is quadratic?
The terms are identical on both sides, so they cancel:
No — it is linear, with the single root . Check: , and . Both sides agree, so the linear answer is correct and there is no second root to look for.
That example is worth remembering. Two terms with the same coefficient on opposite sides always cancel, and an equation is judged after simplifying, never before.
Worked example 3. Is quadratic?
Yes, with , , .
Worked example 4 — a fractional equation. Write in standard form, for and .
Multiplying through by :
So it is quadratic in disguise, with , , .
Notice the restriction written alongside it. The original equation is meaningless at and , so those values would have to be discarded even if they appeared as roots. They do not here — the roots of are and — but stating the restriction is part of a complete answer.
Signs are where marks disappear. In the values are and ; writing because the number printed is is the error that then ruins every later calculation. Read the sign that sits in front of the term.
How do you solve a quadratic equation by splitting the middle term?
**Find two numbers whose product is and whose sum is , split the middle term into those two pieces, group in pairs, and take out the common factor. Then set each factor to zero.
Why setting each factor to zero is valid. If a product of two quantities is zero, at least one of them must be zero. That is the entire logic of the method**, and it is worth stating in an answer: from it follows that or .
Worked example 1. Solve .
Here and , so we need two numbers with product and sum : those are and .
So or .
Check both. At : . At : . Both roots satisfy the equation.
Worked example 2. Solve .
Now and , so we need product and sum : those are and .
So or .
**Check at **: . Correct.
Worked example 3 — equal roots. Solve .
Product and sum , so both numbers are :
**The only root is , and it is called a repeated or equal root because the same factor appears twice.
Check**: . Correct.
Worked example 4 — a common factor first. Solve .
Product , sum , so the numbers are and :
So or . **Check at **: . Correct.
The habit that makes splitting reliable. Write down and as a pair, with their signs, before guessing anything. Then the two numbers are determined: if the product is negative the two numbers have opposite signs, and if the product is positive they share the sign of . That rule turns guessing into a short search, and it is what separates a student who factorises in thirty seconds from one who tries pairs at random.
A root always means a factor. Once you have the roots you can rebuild the equation, which is the fastest possible check: roots and come from , which is where we started. Rebuilding takes one line and catches every sign slip.
Why setting each factor to zero is valid. If a product of two quantities is zero, at least one of them must be zero. That is the entire logic of the method**, and it is worth stating in an answer: from it follows that or .
Worked example 1. Solve .
Here and , so we need two numbers with product and sum : those are and .
So or .
Check both. At : . At : . Both roots satisfy the equation.
Worked example 2. Solve .
Now and , so we need product and sum : those are and .
So or .
**Check at **: . Correct.
Worked example 3 — equal roots. Solve .
Product and sum , so both numbers are :
**The only root is , and it is called a repeated or equal root because the same factor appears twice.
Check**: . Correct.
Worked example 4 — a common factor first. Solve .
Product , sum , so the numbers are and :
So or . **Check at **: . Correct.
The habit that makes splitting reliable. Write down and as a pair, with their signs, before guessing anything. Then the two numbers are determined: if the product is negative the two numbers have opposite signs, and if the product is positive they share the sign of . That rule turns guessing into a short search, and it is what separates a student who factorises in thirty seconds from one who tries pairs at random.
A root always means a factor. Once you have the roots you can rebuild the equation, which is the fastest possible check: roots and come from , which is where we started. Rebuilding takes one line and catches every sign slip.
How do you form a quadratic from a word problem and reject the wrong root?
Name the unknown, write the condition as an equation, solve it, and then test each root against the meaning of the unknown. A length, an age, a count or a speed cannot be negative, and a count must be a whole number.
Worked example 1 — consecutive integers. Find two consecutive positive integers whose product is .
Let the smaller integer be , so the next one is :
Product and sum , so the numbers are and :
So or .
Now the rejection, and it must be written out. The problem asks for positive integers, so is inadmissible. **The integers are and .
Check**: . Correct.
Worked example 2 — an area. The length of a rectangular park is m more than twice its breadth, and its area is m. Find its dimensions.
Let the breadth be metres, so the length is metres:
Product and sum , so the numbers are and :
So or .
**A breadth cannot be m, so that root is rejected. The breadth is m and the length is m.
Check**: m, and is indeed more than twice . Both conditions hold.
Worked example 3 — an age. The product of a boy's age two years ago and his age four years from now is . Find his present age.
Let his present age be years:
Product and sum , giving and :
So or . An age cannot be negative, so .
Check: two years ago he was and four years from now he will be , and . Correct.
Worked example 4 — two roots both valid. Two friends together have marbles. Each loses marbles, and the product of the numbers they now have is . Find how many each had.
Let one friend have marbles, so the other has :
Product and sum , giving and :
So or .
Here both roots are admissible, and they describe the same situation from the two friends' points of view: one had and the other . Neither is rejected.
Check: , and after losing each they hold and , whose product is . Correct.
So rejection is not automatic. The test is always the same question: does this value make sense for the quantity the letter stands for? A count of marbles of makes sense; a breadth of m does not; and when both roots survive the test, both belong in the answer.
Worked example 5 — two numbers differing by a fixed amount. Two numbers differ by and their product is . Find them.
Let the smaller be , so the larger is :
Product and sum , giving and :
So or . If the question says positive numbers, the pair is and ; if it does not, the pair and is equally valid, since their difference is and their product is . Read the wording before rejecting anything.
Worked example 1 — consecutive integers. Find two consecutive positive integers whose product is .
Let the smaller integer be , so the next one is :
Product and sum , so the numbers are and :
So or .
Now the rejection, and it must be written out. The problem asks for positive integers, so is inadmissible. **The integers are and .
Check**: . Correct.
Worked example 2 — an area. The length of a rectangular park is m more than twice its breadth, and its area is m. Find its dimensions.
Let the breadth be metres, so the length is metres:
Product and sum , so the numbers are and :
So or .
**A breadth cannot be m, so that root is rejected. The breadth is m and the length is m.
Check**: m, and is indeed more than twice . Both conditions hold.
Worked example 3 — an age. The product of a boy's age two years ago and his age four years from now is . Find his present age.
Let his present age be years:
Product and sum , giving and :
So or . An age cannot be negative, so .
Check: two years ago he was and four years from now he will be , and . Correct.
Worked example 4 — two roots both valid. Two friends together have marbles. Each loses marbles, and the product of the numbers they now have is . Find how many each had.
Let one friend have marbles, so the other has :
Product and sum , giving and :
So or .
Here both roots are admissible, and they describe the same situation from the two friends' points of view: one had and the other . Neither is rejected.
Check: , and after losing each they hold and , whose product is . Correct.
So rejection is not automatic. The test is always the same question: does this value make sense for the quantity the letter stands for? A count of marbles of makes sense; a breadth of m does not; and when both roots survive the test, both belong in the answer.
Worked example 5 — two numbers differing by a fixed amount. Two numbers differ by and their product is . Find them.
Let the smaller be , so the larger is :
Product and sum , giving and :
So or . If the question says positive numbers, the pair is and ; if it does not, the pair and is equally valid, since their difference is and their product is . Read the wording before rejecting anything.
Exam tip
What does a full-mark quadratic answer contain?
Standard form, the split, the factors, both roots, and a written sentence about the root you reject. Each of those is a separate step an examiner can tick.
- **Simplify to before anything else**, and state , and with their signs if the question asks
- **Write and down as a pair before searching for the two numbers
- If is negative the two numbers have opposite signs**; if it is positive they share the sign of
- Group in pairs and take out the common bracket — the two brackets must come out identical, and if they do not, the split was wrong
- Say why each factor is set to zero: if a product is zero, one of the factors is zero
- Give both roots, even when one will be rejected
- Reject in words: "a breadth cannot be negative, so is inadmissible"
- Answer the original question with units, and check the answer against every condition in the problem
- Rebuild the equation from your roots as a final check
The misconception to name. An equation containing is not automatically quadratic. ** is linear**, because the terms cancel, and a student who reports two roots for it has answered a question that was never asked. Simplify first, classify second.
A second trap. Rejecting a root because it is negative, without checking what the letter stands for. A temperature, a coordinate or a difference may legitimately be negative — only quantities that cannot be negative by nature, such as lengths, areas, ages, speeds and counts, force a rejection. And in the marbles problem both roots survived, so the reflex to discard one is itself a source of lost marks.
- **Simplify to before anything else**, and state , and with their signs if the question asks
- **Write and down as a pair before searching for the two numbers
- If is negative the two numbers have opposite signs**; if it is positive they share the sign of
- Group in pairs and take out the common bracket — the two brackets must come out identical, and if they do not, the split was wrong
- Say why each factor is set to zero: if a product is zero, one of the factors is zero
- Give both roots, even when one will be rejected
- Reject in words: "a breadth cannot be negative, so is inadmissible"
- Answer the original question with units, and check the answer against every condition in the problem
- Rebuild the equation from your roots as a final check
The misconception to name. An equation containing is not automatically quadratic. ** is linear**, because the terms cancel, and a student who reports two roots for it has answered a question that was never asked. Simplify first, classify second.
A second trap. Rejecting a root because it is negative, without checking what the letter stands for. A temperature, a coordinate or a difference may legitimately be negative — only quantities that cannot be negative by nature, such as lengths, areas, ages, speeds and counts, force a rejection. And in the marbles problem both roots survived, so the reflex to discard one is itself a source of lost marks.
Did you know
Why does a factorised equation give away its answers instantly?
Zero has a property no other number has. If a product of two numbers equals zero, one of them must be zero. There is no way to multiply two non-zero numbers and land on zero.
Compare that with any other target. If a product of two numbers is , the pair could be and , or and , or and , or a thousand other things. **Knowing the product is tells you almost nothing about either factor. Knowing the product is zero tells you a great deal.
Which is exactly why every quadratic is moved to the form "something " before it is factorised. The standard form is not a tidiness convention — it is what makes the zero-product property available.
And it explains a mistake that looks reasonable and is not.** Faced with
a student may write or . Neither follows, because a product of can be built in endless ways. The only route is to expand, subtract from both sides, and factorise the result:
A different equation with different roots, and the shortcut would have produced neither of them.
The same property explains the repeated root. When factorises as , the two factors are the same, so the two answers coincide. There is still one factor set to zero — there is just only one distinct way to do it. The equation has two roots in the counting sense and one root in the value sense, and examiners accept either phrasing so long as you say which you mean.
One last consequence worth noticing. The zero-product property works for any number of factors, so a cubic like is read off in one line: , or . Nothing about the method is special to quadratics — what is special to quadratics is that they can always be forced into a product of two linear factors once you allow the quadratic formula of the next part. Factorisation by inspection works when the roots are rational; the formula works always, and that is precisely the gap Part 2 fills.
Compare that with any other target. If a product of two numbers is , the pair could be and , or and , or and , or a thousand other things. **Knowing the product is tells you almost nothing about either factor. Knowing the product is zero tells you a great deal.
Which is exactly why every quadratic is moved to the form "something " before it is factorised. The standard form is not a tidiness convention — it is what makes the zero-product property available.
And it explains a mistake that looks reasonable and is not.** Faced with
a student may write or . Neither follows, because a product of can be built in endless ways. The only route is to expand, subtract from both sides, and factorise the result:
A different equation with different roots, and the shortcut would have produced neither of them.
The same property explains the repeated root. When factorises as , the two factors are the same, so the two answers coincide. There is still one factor set to zero — there is just only one distinct way to do it. The equation has two roots in the counting sense and one root in the value sense, and examiners accept either phrasing so long as you say which you mean.
One last consequence worth noticing. The zero-product property works for any number of factors, so a cubic like is read off in one line: , or . Nothing about the method is special to quadratics — what is special to quadratics is that they can always be forced into a product of two linear factors once you allow the quadratic formula of the next part. Factorisation by inspection works when the roots are rational; the formula works always, and that is precisely the gap Part 2 fills.
Exam relevance
How does factorising quadratics prepare you for JEE?
This is foundation work for Class 11 Quadratic Equations, Complex Numbers and Sequences and Series, and for a great deal of JEE Main and JEE Advanced algebra.
Where the standard form leads. Class 11 keeps unchanged and builds the whole theory of roots on the three coefficients: the sum and product of the roots, the discriminant, the sign of the quadratic over an interval, and the position of the roots relative to a given number. **Every one of those reads , and , so the discipline of simplifying before classifying is the first step of each.
Where the zero-product property leads. It is the engine behind solving any** polynomial or trigonometric equation by factorisation. A JEE question asking for the solutions of in an interval is answered by exactly the reasoning used here, applied to trigonometric factors instead of linear ones. The property does not change; only the factors do.
Where the splitting technique leads. It remains the fastest route whenever the roots are rational, and JEE Main rewards speed. **A candidate who factorises by inspection saves the time that the formula would cost, and over a paper that matters.
Where the rejection step leads. Competitive papers set problems where an algebraic solution must be tested against a domain restriction — a logarithm needs a positive argument, a square root needs a non-negative one, an inverse trigonometric function has a restricted range. The habit of asking whether a root is admissible is the same habit, and in JEE it is the difference between two correct-looking options.
Where the word problems lead. Area, speed and age models reappear in optimisation problems in Class 12 Application of Derivatives, where the same quadratic is formed and then maximised rather than solved. Forming the equation is the shared skill.
Question types to expect. At this level: standard form and coefficients, factorisation, and a word problem with a rejected root. In competitive papers: sign of a quadratic, roots in a given interval, equations reducible to quadratics, and domain-restricted solutions.
The single trap that costs marks. Splitting a product that is not equal to zero. does not give — and the same error appears at JEE level as setting a factor equal to a non-zero right-hand side in a trigonometric equation, which produces spurious solutions that a careful candidate never generates.
A second trap.** Treating every equation with an as quadratic. Cancelling terms can reduce the degree, and Class 11 sets deliberately disguised equations where the leading coefficient contains a parameter that may be zero — in which case the equation is linear and has one root, not two.
Board versus competitive emphasis. The CBSE paper marks the standard form, the split, both roots and the written rejection; a competitive paper marks the final set of admissible values. The transferable habit is always moving everything to one side and comparing with zero before reasoning about factors — because zero is the only target that tells you something about the factors.
Where the standard form leads. Class 11 keeps unchanged and builds the whole theory of roots on the three coefficients: the sum and product of the roots, the discriminant, the sign of the quadratic over an interval, and the position of the roots relative to a given number. **Every one of those reads , and , so the discipline of simplifying before classifying is the first step of each.
Where the zero-product property leads. It is the engine behind solving any** polynomial or trigonometric equation by factorisation. A JEE question asking for the solutions of in an interval is answered by exactly the reasoning used here, applied to trigonometric factors instead of linear ones. The property does not change; only the factors do.
Where the splitting technique leads. It remains the fastest route whenever the roots are rational, and JEE Main rewards speed. **A candidate who factorises by inspection saves the time that the formula would cost, and over a paper that matters.
Where the rejection step leads. Competitive papers set problems where an algebraic solution must be tested against a domain restriction — a logarithm needs a positive argument, a square root needs a non-negative one, an inverse trigonometric function has a restricted range. The habit of asking whether a root is admissible is the same habit, and in JEE it is the difference between two correct-looking options.
Where the word problems lead. Area, speed and age models reappear in optimisation problems in Class 12 Application of Derivatives, where the same quadratic is formed and then maximised rather than solved. Forming the equation is the shared skill.
Question types to expect. At this level: standard form and coefficients, factorisation, and a word problem with a rejected root. In competitive papers: sign of a quadratic, roots in a given interval, equations reducible to quadratics, and domain-restricted solutions.
The single trap that costs marks. Splitting a product that is not equal to zero. does not give — and the same error appears at JEE level as setting a factor equal to a non-zero right-hand side in a trigonometric equation, which produces spurious solutions that a careful candidate never generates.
A second trap.** Treating every equation with an as quadratic. Cancelling terms can reduce the degree, and Class 11 sets deliberately disguised equations where the leading coefficient contains a parameter that may be zero — in which case the equation is linear and has one root, not two.
Board versus competitive emphasis. The CBSE paper marks the standard form, the split, both roots and the written rejection; a competitive paper marks the final set of admissible values. The transferable habit is always moving everything to one side and comparing with zero before reasoning about factors — because zero is the only target that tells you something about the factors.
Key takeaways
What must you be able to do from this part?
One standard form, one method and one honest rejection.
- Standard form is with — and is part of the definition
- Simplify before classifying. becomes , but collapses to and is linear
- **Read and with their signs**, so has and
- Fractional equations can be quadratic in disguise — becomes , with and noted
- To split the middle term, find two numbers with product and sum ; opposite signs if that product is negative, matching the sign of if it is positive
- **** gives , so or
- **** gives , so or
- **** gives , a repeated root at
- The zero-product property is the reason each factor is set to zero, and it works only against zero
- **Consecutive positive integers with product ** are and , rejecting
- **A park with length m more than twice its breadth and area m** is m by m, rejecting
- **A boy whose age two years ago times his age in four years is ** is , rejecting
- Both roots can be valid — marbles split as and satisfies the condition either way round
- Rebuild the equation from your roots as a one-line final check
The sharpest self-test is a rebuild. Solve , then multiply your two factors back out and see whether you land exactly on the equation you started with — signs included.
- Standard form is with — and is part of the definition
- Simplify before classifying. becomes , but collapses to and is linear
- **Read and with their signs**, so has and
- Fractional equations can be quadratic in disguise — becomes , with and noted
- To split the middle term, find two numbers with product and sum ; opposite signs if that product is negative, matching the sign of if it is positive
- **** gives , so or
- **** gives , so or
- **** gives , a repeated root at
- The zero-product property is the reason each factor is set to zero, and it works only against zero
- **Consecutive positive integers with product ** are and , rejecting
- **A park with length m more than twice its breadth and area m** is m by m, rejecting
- **A boy whose age two years ago times his age in four years is ** is , rejecting
- Both roots can be valid — marbles split as and satisfies the condition either way round
- Rebuild the equation from your roots as a one-line final check
The sharpest self-test is a rebuild. Solve , then multiply your two factors back out and see whether you land exactly on the equation you started with — signs included.