One Multiplication Tells You Whether Two Ratios Match
Learn to write and simplify a ratio, test two ratios for proportion by cross-multiplying, find a missing term in a proportion, and read a table to decide whether two quantities change by the same factor.
How do you check whether two ratios are equal without simplifying either?
Cross-multiply. For and , compare with . They match, so the ratios are equal.
One multiplication each side, and no need to reduce anything. This page covers everything in the CBSE Class 8 Mathematics chapter's first part: writing and simplifying ratios, testing for proportion, finding a missing term, and reading a table of paired values.
One multiplication each side, and no need to reduce anything. This page covers everything in the CBSE Class 8 Mathematics chapter's first part: writing and simplifying ratios, testing for proportion, finding a missing term, and reading a table of paired values.
How do you write and simplify a ratio?
A ratio compares two quantities of the same kind by division, written and read a is to b. It can also be written as the fraction .
To reduce it to simplest form, divide both terms by their HCF:
A ratio has no unit, because the units cancel — which is why both quantities must be in the same unit before you start.
Different units. Convert first, then simplify:
A recipe calling for rice and water in the ratio means two cups of water for every cup of rice, whatever size the cup.
The requirement of the same kind is real. You can compare 250 g with 2 kg because both are masses, but a ratio of 3 kg to 5 litres is meaningless — there is no unit that makes mass and capacity comparable, so the cancelling that gives a ratio its unit-free nature cannot happen.
To reduce it to simplest form, divide both terms by their HCF:
A ratio has no unit, because the units cancel — which is why both quantities must be in the same unit before you start.
Different units. Convert first, then simplify:
A recipe calling for rice and water in the ratio means two cups of water for every cup of rice, whatever size the cup.
The requirement of the same kind is real. You can compare 250 g with 2 kg because both are masses, but a ratio of 3 kg to 5 litres is meaningless — there is no unit that makes mass and capacity comparable, so the cancelling that gives a ratio its unit-free nature cannot happen.
Formula
How do you test whether two ratios are in proportion?
Four quantities are in proportion when the two ratios are equal, written . The test is cross-multiplication:
The outer terms and are the extremes; the inner terms and are the means. So the rule reads: the product of the extremes equals the product of the means.
Worked examples.
Are in proportion?
Equal, so yes — .
Are in proportion?
Not equal, so no.
Are in proportion?
Equal, so yes. Checking by simplifying instead: and . The same conclusion.
The order of the four numbers matters, and rearranging them can destroy the proportion. The numbers are in proportion, since and . But swap the first two to give and the test fails:
So always multiply first with last and second with third, in the order the question gives them.
The outer terms and are the extremes; the inner terms and are the means. So the rule reads: the product of the extremes equals the product of the means.
Worked examples.
Are in proportion?
Equal, so yes — .
Are in proportion?
Not equal, so no.
Are in proportion?
Equal, so yes. Checking by simplifying instead: and . The same conclusion.
The order of the four numbers matters, and rearranging them can destroy the proportion. The numbers are in proportion, since and . But swap the first two to give and the test fails:
So always multiply first with last and second with third, in the order the question gives them.
How do you find a missing term in a proportion?
Cross-multiply and solve the resulting equation.
Worked example. Find if .
Checking: and . Correct.
Worked example with the unknown first. Find if .
Checking: and . Correct.
Worked example with the unknown in the middle. Find if .
Worked example from a context. If 4 pens cost ₹60, what do 7 pens cost? Setting up :
Checking by the unitary method: one pen costs , so 7 cost . The same answer.
When setting up a proportion from words, keep the quantities in matching positions. Writing puts pens against cost on both sides; writing would mix them up and give a nonsensical answer — so decide what each position represents before cross-multiplying.
Worked example. Find if .
Checking: and . Correct.
Worked example with the unknown first. Find if .
Checking: and . Correct.
Worked example with the unknown in the middle. Find if .
Worked example from a context. If 4 pens cost ₹60, what do 7 pens cost? Setting up :
Checking by the unitary method: one pen costs , so 7 cost . The same answer.
When setting up a proportion from words, keep the quantities in matching positions. Writing puts pens against cost on both sides; writing would mix them up and give a nonsensical answer — so decide what each position represents before cross-multiplying.
How do you read a table to decide whether two quantities are proportional?
Divide each pair and see whether you always get the same factor.
Worked example. A table of petrol used and distance covered:
- 2 litres, 30 km
- 4 litres, 60 km
- 6 litres, 90 km
- 8 litres, 120 km
Dividing distance by petrol each time:
The factor is constant at 15 km per litre, so the two quantities are directly proportional — doubling the petrol doubles the distance. The relationship can be written as .
Worked example that is not proportional:
- 1 hour, ₹5
- 2 hours, ₹9
- 3 hours, ₹13
Dividing:
The factor changes, so these are not proportional. What is constant here is the difference — the charge rises by ₹4 each hour, after a fixed ₹1 at the start — so the relationship is additive, not proportional.
The test to apply is the ratio, not the pattern. A table can look beautifully regular and still fail: the second one increases by a steady ₹4 each hour, which feels proportional but is not, because doubling the hours from 1 to 2 does not double the charge from ₹5 to ₹10. Only a constant quotient means proportional.
Worked example. A table of petrol used and distance covered:
- 2 litres, 30 km
- 4 litres, 60 km
- 6 litres, 90 km
- 8 litres, 120 km
Dividing distance by petrol each time:
The factor is constant at 15 km per litre, so the two quantities are directly proportional — doubling the petrol doubles the distance. The relationship can be written as .
Worked example that is not proportional:
- 1 hour, ₹5
- 2 hours, ₹9
- 3 hours, ₹13
Dividing:
The factor changes, so these are not proportional. What is constant here is the difference — the charge rises by ₹4 each hour, after a fixed ₹1 at the start — so the relationship is additive, not proportional.
The test to apply is the ratio, not the pattern. A table can look beautifully regular and still fail: the second one increases by a steady ₹4 each hour, which feels proportional but is not, because doubling the hours from 1 to 2 does not double the charge from ₹5 to ₹10. Only a constant quotient means proportional.
Exam tip
Exam tip: multiplying first with last, second with third
Proportion questions are short, and the marks are in the setting out.
Write the cross-multiplication explicitly — *product of extremes product of means* — and multiply the first with the last and the second with the third, in the order the question gives them.
Convert both quantities to the same unit before simplifying any ratio, and give the final ratio with no unit.
When building a proportion from words, keep matching quantities in matching positions, and say what each position stands for.
Check your answer by simplifying both ratios — and both reduce to , which confirms in one line.
And for a table, compute the quotient for every row. A constant difference is not proportionality.
Write the cross-multiplication explicitly — *product of extremes product of means* — and multiply the first with the last and the second with the third, in the order the question gives them.
Convert both quantities to the same unit before simplifying any ratio, and give the final ratio with no unit.
When building a proportion from words, keep matching quantities in matching positions, and say what each position stands for.
Check your answer by simplifying both ratios — and both reduce to , which confirms in one line.
And for a table, compute the quotient for every row. A constant difference is not proportionality.
Did you know
Why does cross-multiplication work at all?
Because it is just clearing the fractions from an equation.
Saying is saying . Multiply both sides by and then by — which is allowed, since doing the same thing to both sides keeps an equation true — and the denominators disappear, leaving .
So cross-multiplication is not a separate trick to memorise. It is the balancing method from equations, applied to a statement that two fractions are equal — which is also why it works just as well for finding a missing term as for testing four given numbers.
Saying is saying . Multiply both sides by and then by — which is allowed, since doing the same thing to both sides keeps an equation true — and the denominators disappear, leaving .
So cross-multiplication is not a separate trick to memorise. It is the balancing method from equations, applied to a statement that two fractions are equal — which is also why it works just as well for finding a missing term as for testing four given numbers.
Key takeaways
Ratio and proportion: quick revision
- A ratio compares two quantities of the same kind and has no unit; convert to one unit, then divide by the HCF — .
- Four numbers are in proportion when — the product of the extremes equals the product of the means.
- So are in proportion since both products are 36, while are not.
- The order matters, so multiply first with last and second with third as given.
- Find a missing term by cross-multiplying and solving: gives , so .
- In a table, two quantities are proportional only when the quotient is constant — 15 km per litre throughout — and a constant difference is not proportionality.
You will remember all of this far better after answering five questions on it than after reading it twice.
- Four numbers are in proportion when — the product of the extremes equals the product of the means.
- So are in proportion since both products are 36, while are not.
- The order matters, so multiply first with last and second with third as given.
- Find a missing term by cross-multiplying and solving: gives , so .
- In a table, two quantities are proportional only when the quotient is constant — 15 km per litre throughout — and a constant difference is not proportionality.
You will remember all of this far better after answering five questions on it than after reading it twice.