Free Mathematics Class 7 ICSE notes · practise this chapter with an AI quiz

← All study notes

Prove Two Triangles Match and Six Facts Come Free

Learn congruence by superimposition, write the vertex correspondence correctly, choose between SSS, SAS, ASA and RHS, and use c.p.c.t. to prove further results in a single step.

What does proving two triangles congruent actually give you?

Six equalities at once — three pairs of sides and three pairs of angles. You establish three of them, and the remaining three follow automatically by c.p.c.t., meaning corresponding parts of congruent triangles.

That is why congruence is the engine behind most geometry proofs. This page covers everything in the ICSE Class 7 Mathematics chapter on congruency: congruence by superimposition, vertex correspondence, the four criteria, and proofs using c.p.c.t.

What does congruence mean by superimposition?

Two figures are congruent if one placed exactly over the other covers it completely, with nothing left over. The symbol is .

The practical test is tracing: copy one figure onto tracing paper, then slide, turn or flip it onto the other. If it fits exactly, they are congruent. Those three movements never change a length or an angle, which is why the fit survives them.

- Two line segments are congruent when their lengths are equal. So a 5 cm segment is congruent to any other 5 cm segment.
- Two angles are congruent when their measures are equal, however long the arms are drawn. A angle with 2 cm arms is congruent to a angle with 10 cm arms.
- Two plane figures are congruent when both shape and size match.

Two identical set-squares from a geometry box stay congruent even when one is turned upside down, and two ₹5 coins are congruent circles.

The point to be clear about is that congruence needs both shape and size. Two squares of side 3 cm and 6 cm have exactly the same shape and are not congruent — they are only similar. Equal area is not enough either: a rectangle and a square both cover 16 square units without being congruent.

How do you write the correspondence between vertices?

The order of the letters records which vertex matches which, so it carries information and cannot be rearranged.

Writing states that

- A matches P, B matches Q, C matches R

and therefore these six parts are equal:

- Sides: , ,
- Angles: , ,

Each pair is read straight off the matching positions. The side pairs with because A pairs with P and B with Q.

So and make different claims, and at most one of them is true for a given pair of triangles.

The practical habit is to write the correspondence before listing any equal parts, and to let the letters generate the list rather than reading them off the diagram. Copying the letters in whatever order the question printed them is the commonest error here — it silently asserts the wrong pairing and every equality that follows is then wrong too.

How do you choose between SSS, SAS, ASA and RHS?

Each criterion names the three matching parts that are enough to force congruence.

SSS — three pairs of equal sides.

SAS — two pairs of equal sides and the included angle, the one lying between those sides.

ASA (or AAS) — two pairs of equal angles and one pair of equal sides. With two angles known the third is forced, since the angles total , so the side need not be the included one.

RHS — for right-angled triangles only: equal hypotenuse and one other equal side.

Worked example. In : cm, cm, . In : cm, cm, . The equal angle lies between the two equal sides in both, so they are congruent by SAS, and follows by c.p.c.t.

Worked example, RHS. Two right-angled triangles each have hypotenuse 13 cm and one leg 5 cm. They are congruent by RHS, and the third side is forced in both:



giving 12 cm each time.

Two combinations are not criteria. AAA fixes the shape but not the size — an equilateral triangle of side 2 cm and one of side 20 cm have identical angles and are not congruent. And two sides with a non-included angle can fit two different triangles, which is why SAS insists on the included angle.

How do you use c.p.c.t. to prove a geometrical result?

Prove two triangles congruent first, then quote c.p.c.t. to claim the part you actually wanted.

Worked proof — the base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal.

Given with , and the bisector of meeting at D.

In and :

- — given
- — AD bisects
- — common side

So by SAS.

Therefore by c.p.c.t.

The same congruence gives two more results free: by c.p.c.t., so AD also bisects the base; and , which with their sum of makes each , so AD is perpendicular to BC.

Applied numerically: if the vertex angle is , the base angles share the rest, so each is .

The structure of a proof matters as much as the content. List the three matching parts with a reason beside each — given, common, bisector, vertically opposite — then name the criterion, and only then quote c.p.c.t. for the conclusion. Claiming c.p.c.t. before establishing congruence proves nothing at all.
Exam tip

Exam tip: naming the criterion before you quote c.p.c.t.

Congruence proofs are marked line by line, and the marks are in the structure.

Set out the three matching parts on separate lines, each with its reason. Then write *hence by SAS*, and only after that use c.p.c.t. A conclusion with no criterion named loses most of the credit.

Write the vertices in matching order — if A pairs with P and B with Q, the statement reads .

Check the angle is genuinely included before writing SAS, and use RHS only when the triangles are right-angled and the hypotenuse is one of the equal parts.

If a question offers three equal angles, say that AAA is not a criterion and explain why — equal angles fix the shape but not the size.

And remember the common side. AD = AD (common) is a legitimate third fact, and forgetting it is why many proofs stall at two parts.
Did you know

Why does proving three parts equal give you the other three?

Because the right three measurements leave the triangle no freedom at all.

Give three side lengths and the triangle can be built in exactly one way — the arcs of the construction cross at a single point. Once the shape is forced, every remaining side and angle is forced with it.

So c.p.c.t. is not an extra assumption. It records that two triangles which are genuinely identical copies cannot differ in any part, which is why establishing three carefully chosen equalities hands you the other three for nothing.
Key takeaways

Congruent triangles and c.p.c.t.: quick revision

- Congruent figures cover each other exactly; sliding, turning and flipping preserve congruence, but equal shape or equal area alone does not.
- The letter order records the matching: means and .
- SSS, SAS (angle included between the sides), ASA/AAS, and RHS for right-angled triangles with equal hypotenuse and one side.
- AAA is not a criterion — equal angles fix shape but not size; and a non-included angle can fit two triangles.
- c.p.c.t. gives the remaining three equalities once congruence is proved — but only after the criterion is named.
- Proving by SAS shows the base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal, and also that AD bisects BC at .

You will remember all of this far better after answering five questions on it than after reading it twice.

Ready to put this into practice?

Create a personalized quiz on this exact topic — free to start.

Create your own quiz on Congruency: Congruent TrianglesCreate a free account
← Back to all articles