Free Biology Class 12 CBSE notes · practise this chapter with an AI quiz

← All study notes

Why Dark Moths Took Over Soot-Covered Forests

Compare Lamarck's and Darwin's theories and the modern synthesis, see natural selection in moths and drug resistance with its three types, apply the Hardy-Weinberg principle and its disturbing factors, and trace the landmarks of human evolution.

How does evolution actually happen?

Knowing that life has evolved raises a deeper question: what drives the change? Theories from use and disuse to natural selection, combined with genetics and population mathematics, now explain how species change — and how humans themselves arose.

This part covers Lamarck, Darwin and the modern synthesis, variation and types of selection, the Hardy-Weinberg principle, and human evolution.

How does Lamarck's theory of use and disuse compare with Darwin's natural selection and the modern synthetic theory?

Lamarck proposed that organs change through use and disuse and that these acquired changes are inherited, whereas Darwin proposed that heritable variation exists in every population and nature selects individuals that survive and reproduce better; the modern synthetic theory adds mutation and recombination as the sources of that variation.

Lamarck — use and disuse:

- Organs used constantly grow stronger; unused organs weaken
- Acquired characters are inherited
- Rejected because acquired characters, such as strong muscles from exercise, are not inherited

Darwin — natural selection:

- Populations show variation, some of it heritable
- Organisms produce more offspring than can survive, leading to a struggle for existence
- Individuals better suited to their surroundings survive and reproduce more — fitness means reproductive fitness
- Over many generations, favourable traits spread and new species can arise

Modern synthetic theory:

- Combines natural selection with genetics
- Variation comes from mutation and genetic recombination in sexual reproduction
- Natural selection, gene flow, genetic drift and isolation then act on that variation

An everyday example. A wrestler's powerful muscles are not passed on to the children, which is why Lamarck's idea of inheriting acquired characters fails.

The substance. Natural selection does not create variation — it only selects among variations already produced by mutation and recombination.

How do moth colours and drug resistance show natural selection, and what are stabilising, directional and disruptive selection?

Natural selection favours whichever heritable variants survive and reproduce best in a given environment — dark moths spread on soot-darkened trees, and resistant microbes and insects spread after heavy use of antibiotics and pesticides — and it can act in stabilising, directional or disruptive ways.

Moths and industrial pollution:

- Where tree trunks were covered with pale lichens, white-winged moths blended in and outnumbered dark moths
- In industrial areas, soot darkened trunks and killed the lichens, so dark-winged moths blended in while white moths were easily picked off by birds
- No new variant appeared — the existing dark variant was selected

Resistance:

- Antibiotics kill susceptible bacteria, leaving any resistant variants to multiply
- Pesticides similarly select resistant insects

Types of natural selection, for a trait with a bell-shaped distribution:

- Stabilising — favours the average; extremes are removed and the curve narrows
- Directional — favours one extreme; the average shifts that way
- Disruptive — favours both extremes; two peaks develop

An everyday example. Stopping an antibiotic course halfway can leave the toughest bacteria alive to multiply — selection happening inside your own body.

The substance. Resistance is selected, not caused — the antibiotic does not make bacteria resistant; it removes those that are not.

What is the Hardy-Weinberg principle, and what factors disturb genetic equilibrium?

The Hardy-Weinberg principle states that allele and genotype frequencies in a population stay constant across generations unless something disturbs them, so for two alleles with frequencies p and q, p + q = 1 and p² + 2pq + q² = 1; gene flow, genetic drift, mutation, recombination and natural selection disturb this equilibrium and bring about evolution.

The equation:



- — frequency of homozygous dominant AA
- — frequency of heterozygous Aa
- — frequency of homozygous recessive aa

Factors that disturb equilibrium:

- Gene migration or gene flow — alleles enter or leave with moving individuals
- Genetic drift — chance changes in frequency, strongest in small populations; the founder effect arises when a few individuals start a new population with a different gene pool
- Mutation — creates new alleles
- Genetic recombination — produces new allele combinations during gametogenesis
- Natural selection — changes frequencies through differential reproduction

Worked example. In a population, percent of individuals show a recessive trait, so :



So percent are heterozygous carriers and , or percent, are homozygous dominant.

An everyday example. Small, isolated communities that marry mostly within the group can show unusually high frequencies of certain rare disorders — an effect of genetic drift and the founder effect.

The substance. Hardy-Weinberg describes a population that is not evolving — its real value is as a baseline for measuring change.

What are the major landmarks in human evolution, from Dryopithecus to Homo sapiens?

Human evolution passed from ape-like Dryopithecus and more man-like Ramapithecus to the upright-walking Australopithecines, then to Homo habilis, Homo erectus and Neanderthal man, and finally to Homo sapiens, with brain capacity, tool use and culture increasing along the way.

The landmarks:

- Dryopithecus — hairy, walked like gorillas and chimpanzees; more ape-like
- Ramapithecus — also hairy, but more man-like
- Australopithecines — lived in East African grasslands, hunted with stone weapons and ate mainly fruit
- Homo habilis — brain capacity about 650 to 800 cc; probably did not eat meat
- Homo erectus — brain capacity about 900 cc; probably ate meat
- Neanderthal man — brain size about 1400 cc; lived in the Near East and Central Asia, used hides to protect the body and buried the dead
- Homo sapiens — arose in Africa and spread across continents, later developing cave art, agriculture and settlements

An everyday example. Prehistoric rock paintings at Bhimbetka in Madhya Pradesh preserve the art and culture of early modern humans in India.

The substance. Humans did not evolve from modern chimpanzees — humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor.
Exam tip

What earns full marks on natural selection and Hardy-Weinberg?

In every Hardy-Weinberg problem, find q from the recessive frequency first, then p, then the other genotypes — never start from the dominant phenotype.

- Lamarck: use and disuse; inheritance of acquired characters
- Darwin: variation, struggle for existence, survival and reproduction of the fittest
- Selection types: stabilising, directional, disruptive
- Hardy-Weinberg: p + q = 1 and p² + 2pq + q² = 1; disturbed by gene flow, drift, mutation, recombination and selection

The trap. Taking the square root of the dominant phenotype frequency. The dominant phenotype includes both AA and Aa, so only the recessive frequency gives q² directly.
Did you know

Why do dogs of the same species look so different from one another?

A tiny lap dog and a massive guard dog belong to the same species, yet they look strikingly different.

That variety comes from artificial selection: people chose dogs with the traits they wanted and bred them together over many generations, exaggerating small differences into distinct breeds.
Exam relevance

How are natural selection, Hardy-Weinberg and human evolution tested in NEET?

Mechanisms of evolution are a recurring NEET Biology topic, and Hardy-Weinberg problems add a numerical element.

What gets asked. Lamarckism versus Darwinism, examples of natural selection such as moths and resistance, identifying stabilising, directional and disruptive selection from graphs, Hardy-Weinberg calculations and the five disturbing factors, the founder effect, and the brain capacities and features of human ancestors.

Question types. Numerical questions on allele frequencies, graph-based questions on selection, and statement-based and match-the-column questions.

The trap that costs marks. Using pq instead of 2pq for the frequency of heterozygotes.
Key takeaways

What must you be able to do from this part?

- Theories: Lamarck's use and disuse, Darwin's natural selection, and the modern synthesis adding mutation and recombination
- Selection in action: dark moths on soot-covered trees and antibiotic resistance; stabilising, directional and disruptive selection
- Hardy-Weinberg: ; means percent carriers; disturbed by gene flow, drift, mutation, recombination and selection
- Human evolution: from Dryopithecus to Homo sapiens, with brain capacity rising from about cc to about cc by Neanderthal man

If in people in a population shows a recessive trait, what fraction of the population are carriers?

Ready to put this into practice?

Create a personalized quiz on this exact topic — free to start.

Create your own quiz on Evolution — Part 2Create a free account
← Back to all articles