Free Mathematics Class 10 CBSE notes · practise this chapter with an AI quiz

← All study notes

A Weighted Average of Two Points Lands You Anywhere Along the Line Between Them

Use the section formula to find the point dividing a segment in any ratio, take the mid-point as its simplest case, work backwards to the ratio in which a point or an axis divides a segment, find the points of trisection, and complete a parallelogram from three vertices.

How do you find a point a certain fraction of the way along a line?

The distance formula told you how far apart two points are. It said nothing about what lies between them — and that is the gap this part fills.

The question is easy to state. Given two points, where is the point that sits a quarter of the way from the first to the second? A third of the way? Two-fifths? The answer is a weighted average of the two sets of coordinates, and the weights are exactly the two numbers in the ratio, used crosswise.

The simplest case makes the pattern obvious. The mid-point of and is



**Average the -coordinates and average the -coordinates. The section formula is that same idea with unequal weights, so that the point can sit anywhere along the segment rather than only halfway.

From one formula come four kinds of question, and the last two are the ones that carry the most marks:

-
Given the ratio, find the point — a direct substitution
-
Given the point, find the ratio — set up one equation in the unknown ratio
-
Find the ratio in which an axis divides a segment** — use the fact that a point on the -axis has
- Complete a parallelogram or find a point of trisection — use the mid-point in reverse

The fourth of these rests on one geometric fact that is worth stating now. The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other, so the mid-point of one diagonal is the mid-point of the other. That single sentence turns "find the fourth vertex" into two one-line equations.

This page covers the second part of the CBSE Class 10 Maths chapter on coordinate geometry: the section formula, the mid-point formula, finding a dividing ratio, trisection, and completing a parallelogram.
Formula

What is the section formula and how do you substitute into it?

**Multiply each point's coordinates by the other number in the ratio, add, and divide by the sum of the two numbers.**

If the point divides the segment joining and internally in the ratio , then



The crossing over is the whole difficulty. The ratio means , so is **closer to ** when is the larger number — and the formula reflects that by pairing with 's coordinates. **Pairing with instead is the single commonest error in this chapter, and it lands you at a different point on the same segment.

A quick way to remember which goes with which.** If the ratio is the point should be itself, since . Substituting , gives



Correct — so the pairing is confirmed in one line, and this is worth doing in the margin if you are ever unsure.

Worked example 1. Find the coordinates of the point that divides the segment joining and in the ratio .

Here , , and :




**The point is .

Check that it is where it should be.** The ratio means the point is two-fifths of the way from to , so it should be nearer . The -coordinate moved from toward and reached , which is two-fifths of the way: . Correct, and the -coordinate checks the same way: .

That "fraction of the way" check is worth building into every answer. If the ratio is then the point is of the way from to , and confirming one coordinate that way catches a crossed-over substitution immediately.

Worked example 2. Find the point dividing the segment joining and in the ratio .




**The point is .

Check**: means three-quarters of the way from the first point to the second, and . Correct, and the point is much nearer than , as a ratio with a large first number requires.

Worked example 3 — reversing the ratio. Find the point dividing the same segment in the ratio .



**The point is ** — a completely different point from , which is exactly why the order in the ratio matters. ** and name two different points**, and a question that says "divides in the ratio " is fixing both the numbers and their order.

One boundary case. All of this is internal division, where the point lies between and , which is the only case in this syllabus. A negative value in a ratio would signal external division, with the point lying beyond one of the ends — and if a ratio comes out negative in your working, that is a signal to re-read the question rather than to continue.

Why is the mid-point formula just the section formula with equal weights?

**Because the mid-point divides the segment in the ratio , and equal weights turn a weighted average into an ordinary average.**

Substituting into the section formula:



so the mid-point formula is



**Average the -coordinates, average the -coordinates. There is nothing to cross over here, which is why the mid-point formula almost never goes wrong and the section formula often does.

Worked example 1.** Find the mid-point of and .



Worked example 2 — the centre of a circle. The end points of a diameter of a circle are and . Find the centre.

The centre is the mid-point of any diameter:



**The centre is .

Check with the distance formula.** From to is , and to is . Equal, as radii must be.

Worked example 3 — working backwards to the other end. The mid-point of a segment is and one end is . Find the other end.

Let the other end be . From the mid-point formula,




**The other end is .

Check**: the mid-point of and is . Correct.

A faster route to the same answer. Doubling the mid-point and subtracting the known end gives the other end directly:



That shortcut is worth knowing, and it follows straight from rearranging the mid-point formula.

Worked example 4 — with unknowns in the coordinates. The mid-point of the segment joining and is . Find and .

The mid-point is



Equating the -coordinates:



Equating the -coordinates, and using so that :



**So and .

Check**: the points become and , whose mid-point is ; and . Both coordinates match.

The order to work in matters here. The -equation contained only , so it could be solved on its own; the -equation contained both and . Solve the equation with one unknown first, and the second becomes a one-line substitution rather than a simultaneous pair.

How do you find the ratio in which a point or an axis divides a segment?

**Let the ratio be , substitute into the section formula, and use whichever coordinate you know to solve for . Using instead of replaces two unknowns with one.

Worked example 1 — a given point.** Find the ratio in which divides the segment joining and .

Let the ratio be . Then the -coordinate of the dividing point is





**So the ratio is , which is .

Check with the -coordinate**, which was not used:



**The -coordinate comes out as , exactly as given.** That is a genuine independent check, because only the -coordinate was used to find — and it is the step that proves the point really does lie on the segment. If the second coordinate disagrees, the point is not on the line at all.

**Worked example 2 — the -axis.** In what ratio does the -axis divide the segment joining and ? Find the point of division too.

**The key observation: any point on the -axis has .** So set the -coordinate of the section formula to zero with ratio :



**The ratio is **, so the -axis crosses the segment at its mid-point. The point of division is therefore



Check that it makes sense. One end has and the other , symmetric about zero, so the crossing must be halfway. The answer agrees with the geometry, and a ratio other than would have been a sign of error.

**Worked example 3 — the -axis.** In what ratio does the -axis divide the segment joining and ? Find the point.

**Any point on the -axis has :**



**The ratio is .** The -coordinate is then



**The point of division is .

Check by the fraction-of-the-way reasoning.** A ratio of puts the point five-sixths of the way from to . The -coordinate travels from to , a change of , and five-sixths of that is , landing on . Correct.

Worked example 4 — a ratio with a letter in it. Find the ratio in which the point divides the segment joining and .

Using the -coordinate with ratio :





**The ratio is .

Check with the -coordinate:**



**Exactly the given -coordinate. Fractions in the data did not change the method at all.

The two things to take from this section.** Use so there is only one unknown, and always verify with the coordinate you did not use. That verification costs three lines and does something no other check can: it confirms the point lies on the segment rather than merely having the right value in one coordinate.

How do you trisect a segment and complete a parallelogram?

**Trisection needs the section formula twice, in the ratios and . A parallelogram's missing vertex needs only the fact that the diagonals bisect each other.

Worked example 1 — points of trisection.** Find the points of trisection of the segment joining and .

Trisection means dividing the segment into three equal parts, so there are two points. The first, , is one-third of the way from , which is the ratio :




The second, , is two-thirds of the way, which is the ratio :




**The points of trisection are and .

Check with a mid-point.** Since the three parts are equal, must be the mid-point of and :



**Exactly .** And by the same reasoning must be the mid-point of and , which is a second check available for free.

The mistake this question is designed to catch. Using the ratios and . **Trisection points divide the segment and , because the ratio compares the two pieces**, not a piece with the whole. The three pieces are each one-third, so the first point has one piece behind it and two ahead — hence .

Worked example 2 — the fourth vertex of a parallelogram. Three vertices of a parallelogram are , and . Find .

The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other, so the mid-point of equals the mid-point of .

Mid-point of :



Let . Mid-point of :



Equating the two:




**So .

Check with the sides.** In a parallelogram and must be equal and parallel. Going from to means moving right and up; going from to means moving right and up. Identical, so really is a parallelogram.

Which diagonal you use is decided by the lettering. In the diagonals are and , because the vertices are named in order around the figure. **Pairing with instead would give a side, not a diagonal**, and the resulting equations would place somewhere meaningless.

Worked example 3 — two unknown coordinates. If , , and are the vertices of a parallelogram taken in order, find and .

The diagonals are the first-and-third and the second-and-fourth points. Equating their mid-points:



From the -coordinates:



From the -coordinates:



**So and **, and the four vertices are , , and — the same parallelogram as the previous example, which is a reassuring consistency.

Worked example 4 — three equal parts of a different kind. Find the coordinates of the points that divide the segment joining and into four equal parts.

Four equal parts means three points, at the ratios , and :





Check the pattern. The -coordinates run — equal steps of — and the -coordinates run , equal steps of . Both coordinates form arithmetic progressions, which is exactly what equal division along a straight line must produce, and it is the fastest way to verify any answer of this kind.

Notice how the number of points relates to the number of parts. **Dividing into equal parts needs points**, at the ratios , , and so on. Trisection is the case with two points; four parts needs three points. Counting the points wrongly is the first thing to check if an answer feels short.
Exam tip

Which habits protect a section-formula answer?

Write the ratio and the two points down with labels before substituting, and always check with the coordinate you did not use. That one check distinguishes a correct answer from a plausible one.

- **Label and in the order the question gives them, and keep the ratio in the order it was stated
-
Pair with 's coordinates and with 's — the crossing over is what the formula is
-
If you are unsure, test with **, which must return
- Sanity-check with the fraction of the way: a ratio of puts the point of the way from to
- **Use when the ratio is unknown, so there is only one unknown to solve for
-
A point on the -axis has **; a point on the -axis has . That is how axis-division questions start
- Verify with the unused coordinate. It confirms the point lies on the segment, which no other check does
- **Trisection uses and **, never and
- For a parallelogram, equate the mid-points of the two diagonals, and read the diagonals from the lettering
- **Dividing into parts needs points
-
Leave fractional answers as fractions**, so rather than a decimal

The misconception to name. The ratio in the section formula compares the two pieces of the segment, not a piece with the whole. **A point one-third of the way along divides the segment **, because one part lies behind it and two lie ahead. Writing places the point a quarter of the way along, which is a different point entirely.

A second trap. Crossing the weights the wrong way. **With ratio the point is nearer **, so the formula must weight 's coordinates by . The quickest guard is the fraction-of-the-way check on a single coordinate: if the answer sits on the wrong side of the middle, the weights were swapped.
Did you know

Why does a formula about ratios show up in finding an average mark?

Look at the section formula again with the letters rearranged:



That is a weighted average, with and as the weights. And weighted averages are everywhere.

- A term mark where one test counts twice as much as another is
- A cricket average over two seasons with different numbers of innings
- The average price when you buy kg of rice at one rate and kg at another
- The centre of mass of two objects of different masses on a see-saw

In every case the formula is identical, and the reason is that all of them are asking the same question: where does a point sit between two extremes, given how much each extreme counts?

The see-saw picture is the most useful one. Put a mass at and a mass at and the balance point sits exactly where the section formula puts . Notice the crossing over appears here too, and now it makes physical sense: the balance point is nearer the heavier mass, so the heavier mass at pulls the point toward — which is why multiplies 's coordinates.

That is a genuinely reliable way to remember the formula. If you are ever unsure which weight goes with which point, ask which point the answer should be nearer. The larger weight drags the answer toward its own point, exactly as a heavier child drags the balance point toward themself.

And it explains the mid-point. Equal masses balance in the middle, so equal weights give the ordinary average. The mid-point formula is the see-saw with two children of the same weight.

One more place the same idea appears in this chapter. The centroid of a triangle — the point where the three medians meet — divides each median in the ratio from the vertex, and its coordinates turn out to be the plain average of the three vertices:



Three equal weights, one at each vertex, and the balance point is where a triangular sheet of card would balance on a pin. The formula you learn for two points extends to three, to four, and to as many as you like — which is why a weighted average is one of the most reusable ideas in the whole subject.
Exam relevance

How is the section formula used in JEE?

This is foundation work for Class 11 Straight Lines and Three-Dimensional Geometry, and for Class 12 Vectors — a combination that makes it one of the most reused formulas in JEE Main and JEE Advanced.

Where the formula leads directly. Class 11 extends it to three dimensions, with a -coordinate handled in exactly the same way, and Class 12 writes it in vector form: the position vector of a point dividing and in the ratio is . The crossing over is identical, and a candidate who has the see-saw picture in mind never gets it backwards.

Where external division enters. Class 11 adds the external case, where the formula becomes — the same expression with the signs of flipped. JEE questions frequently ask which of the two applies, and recognising a negative ratio as external division is the skill being tested.

Where the centroid leads. Class 11 uses the median property constantly, along with the incentre, which is a weighted average of the vertices with the side lengths as weights. JEE Advanced sets problems on all of these, and they are all the section formula with different weights.

Where the parallelogram argument leads. "The diagonals bisect each other" becomes a standard vector proof, and the same mid-point equality is used to show that four points are coplanar or that three vectors are linearly dependent. The Class 10 method transfers with no change except the notation.

Where the axis-division trick leads. Setting one coordinate to zero to find where a line crosses an axis is exactly how intercepts are found in Class 11, and how the point of intersection with a plane is found in three dimensions. JEE Main sets it as a one-liner.

Question types to expect. At this level: find the dividing point, find the ratio, find where an axis divides a segment, trisect a segment, and complete a parallelogram. In competitive papers: internal versus external division, the centroid and incentre, ratio questions in three dimensions, and vector proofs of concurrency.

The single trap that costs marks. Crossing the weights the wrong way. **With ratio , the coordinate of is multiplied by — and the identical error in Class 12 vectors puts the point on the wrong side of the midpoint, which quietly breaks an entire proof.

A second trap.** Using for a trisection point. The ratio compares the two pieces, so trisection is and ; the same counting error at JEE level appears when a segment is divided into several parts and the wrong sub-ratio is used.

Board versus competitive emphasis. The CBSE paper marks the formula, the substitution, both coordinates and the verification; a competitive paper marks the single point or ratio. The transferable habit is checking with the coordinate you did not use — it is the only check that proves the point actually lies on the segment, and in three dimensions, where a wrong answer is far harder to spot by eye, it becomes indispensable.
Key takeaways

What must you be able to do from this part?

One weighted average, used forwards and backwards.

- Section formula: the point dividing and internally in the ratio is
- ** pairs with 's coordinates — the larger weight drags the point toward its own end
-
Test with ** if you are unsure; it must return
- **The point is of the way from to — use this as a sanity check
-
and in the ratio ** gives ; ** and in the ratio ** gives , while gives
- Mid-point formula: , which is the section formula with
- The other end from a mid-point is , so a mid-point of with one end at gives
- **To find an unknown ratio, take it as ** — divides and in the ratio
- **A point on the -axis has **, so the -axis divides and in the ratio at
- **A point on the -axis has **, so the -axis divides and in the ratio at
- Always verify with the coordinate you did not use — it proves the point lies on the segment
- **Trisection uses and **, so and give and
- **Dividing into equal parts needs points, and both coordinates of those points form arithmetic progressions
-
The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other**, so , , give
- Read the diagonals from the lettering — in they are and
- The centroid of a triangle is the plain average of the three vertices, and it divides each median from the vertex

The sharpest self-test is a segment of your own. Pick two points, divide them into four equal parts, and check that the five -coordinates and the five -coordinates each form an arithmetic progression — if either does not, one of your three ratios was wrong.

Ready to put this into practice?

Create a personalized quiz on this exact topic — free to start.

Create your own quiz on Coordinate Geometry — Part 2Create a free account
← Back to all articles